Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

News next week : "Donald Trump Jr opens US Drone company with exclusive import license from China."

> DJI responded publicly that month that they had nothing to hide, and subsequently spent a year trying to convince the U.S. government to begin the audit. But no federal agency even began

There's your answer. There was never any concern over Americans data being sent to China.

Also they didn't "Follow through", they simply let the clock run out without even evaluating DJI's reponse to the claims.



It’s hard to say on this one. There is a pretty extensive history of Chinese govt spying via consumer products [0]. Having worked formerly with the intelligence community, they tend not to tip their hand when they are aware of asymmetrical information.

It’s plausible that the determination was made that there were backdoors/spy equipment/whatever in the products, so no audit or smooth talking from corp representatives would make a difference in this case, given the supply chain remains controlled by an adversary. If you don’t trust that an audit can be executed with integrity then there’s not much point in conducting one at all.

The fact that this has been extended to all foreign drones does make that feel like more of a political statement though, or at the very least the original intent is being hijacked for political theater.

0. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa...


The link you shared details hacker groups exploiting consumer hardware. This is very different than selling compromised, backdoored hardware.


Intent is of course tricky to prove, but there is overwhelming evidence that’s Chinese government views the role of Chinese companies in the consumer electronics supply chain as a strategic, exploitable asset.

> Huawei has a history of IP theft and security incidents related to backdoors and malware going back nearly 20 years.

> ZTE has been accused of including unusual backdoors in some products and was caught selling equipment containing U.S. technology to Iran and North Korea, in violation of trade agreements. … Security researchers, however, noted that the backdoors were “highly unusual” and appeared intentional because they were supporting software updates.

Source: https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/112475/documents/...


It's doubtful that there is currently a backdoor or anything that would fail an audit.

The problem is the software updates. Whoever controls those keys has an entire domestic fleet a single firmware update away. Probably won't even be DJI, but some either state or non-state hacker that happens to acquire the update keys.


It'll have a shiny gold paint job, and the data will go to palantir instead. Or it would, if it ever reached the buyers.



Wow.. my comment on that was means as a little tounge in cheek. Isn't there some expression about when life imitates parody?


Maybe the US government can make a requirement that DJI divest and spin of a US controlled subsidiary. That seems to have worked great with ByteDance and TikTok.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: